Related Article Content

Project management, ended right is a benefit to any firm. It gives you a clearly stated target, metrics for how to get it, and a time and timetable for how to meet the ambition with financial plans for labor overheads, expansion and prototypes, and bringing it to market.

There are two cases from the sporting tools discipline that highlight project management, one positively one negatively. We'll be covering these examples from our most recent project management training in tandem, as a comparison and contrast so that you can understand good project management skills without driving your workers nuts, or wrecking your product release announcement.

The two products are for distinct sports (cycling and hockey), but that shouldn't discourage you from understanding the lessons needed from them.

First, both manufacturers looked to product evaluations of their existing clients to taste and determine unmet consumer wishes. In the sphere of cycling, there have been lots of rumor on injury to men caused by bad produced cycling seats - they limit blood flow to the groin and set off aches and can even set off injury to the erectile tissues, if not correctly adjusted. There's reliable medical literature supporting this, and the studies suggested that, among male competitive cyclists, that this was something of a concern.

The product surveys for the hockey gear manufacturers was more uncomplicated - was it feasible to chart the methods that have given golf clubs superior driving range (with carbon fiber, and meticulously well-adjusted heads) to hockey sticks? Studies of their possible customers pointed to there was a solid demand for this.

Where the cycling corporation and hockey stick manufacturers varied in their original reviews was in defining their end ambitions. The hockey stick manufacturers assumed that since there was a positive indication for the product, that only developing it would be a flourishing product launch - they didn't take the time to weigh up what a successful 'super stick' would do and be for their clients. The cycling company started out with a down-to-earth target - 'Make the most comfortable bicycle seat, contoured for the male anatomy, that can be done.'

Both groups spent time and money researching materials science. The cycling gear makers looked into closed cell against open cell foam, seat coverage, and more. They put sensors into the shorts of cyclists and put them on regular bicycle seats to see where the stress points were, and they put motion capture sensors on the cyclists to see what the 'expected posture' was when riding a bicycle at diverse exertion levels - rolling along on a flat has a another posture than cornering tightly in a criterium, against ascending hard on a road race stage.

The hockey stick producer made a mistake by designing the stick and thinking that the information from a golf swing (which uses a wider traverse of arc) would map over to a hockey stick. While they harvested a number of operation facts from professional and collegiate hockey players, they mostly went with what was known, and improved the materials along the lines of high end golf clubs. The conclusion was a stick with a much more stiff pole and a blade with a exceptionally odd sweet spot.

By contrast, the cycle seat manufacturer had identified ways to restyle the front of the seat, so that the mass of the cyclist was distributed along the hip bones and tail bone, instead through the pubic bone. Their early trial products got objections that there was inadequate power transfer to the legs while sitting down - the various lengths of the femur and tibia mean that the quantity of power that's transmitted in a pedaling motion alters as the angle on the forward sprockets alters. So they put back a number of the reinforcing construction but changed the character of it, so that the groin area got aid without being, well, compressed or numbed by repetitive training.

When the hockey stick company sent their expensive models out, the models got met with lackluster replies. The sticks had, in the expression of the players, a 'dead feel' to them - they didn't pass on the sense of the puck from the blade up the shaft as well as traditional wooden and fiberglass sticks did. Also the endeavours to make a standardized sweet spot went totally awry, because that the hockey players have, from the time when the days of wooden sticks, taped and bent the blades of their sticks for customized handling techniques, and it's a very personalized process. The high density carbon fiber heads couldn't be warped without them delaminating (something that produced looks of horror when the delaminated prototypes were sent back to the firm!) and taping them bended to, in the words of one participant result in a 'I'm hitting the puck with a slab of bologna.' as a reply. In essence the makers had managed to make a perfectly designed hockey stick, for one player, who had the playing features they'd modeled the new stick from.

The end result of these two different methods to customer feedback ended in very dissimilar product development processes; the hockey stick firm discovered that their work to date had been wasted - since they didn't ask the suitable questions of their clients base. The cycling seat manufacturer attuned their design in response to user testing, and developed a style for determining triumph that was adaptable enough to take mid course modifications.

As you can see from these divergent case studies, project management is crucially imperative to the progression of any project, and the key to project management is preserving flexibility throughout the development process to see to the unforeseen outcomes of tests, along with having an end user driven model of what constitutes success.

More resources on project management training for the sporting equipment industry